Computer Videos

Comments on 'Barack Obama Addresses Planned Parenthood'

Back

Next

Singpraise11 (October 26th, 2008 @ 5:11 pm)
You made the choice when you pulled your pants down. What about the innocent baby's choice?
aprilschone1 (October 9th, 2008 @ 9:51 pm)
I'm proud to have him as the person I'm voting for:) MY vagina...my CHOICE.
toccaalei (September 4th, 2008 @ 12:17 am)
There's a big difference between supporting "saving a child" and wanting to make abortion rare. I'd like to see abortion rates lessened through higher availability of birth control, more options for women to do with their reproductive health (many are turned away when they want to be sterilized), and sex-education programs that consist of more than, "don't have sex." I don't see how that makes me any less pro-choice.
gordy1510 (July 29th, 2008 @ 5:01 am)
America NEEDS a president who is sensible about women's issues and reproductive issues. Planned Parenthood isn't an extremist organization but is, in fact, one of the largest providers of healthcare in the country in addition to being a very mainline organization that supports very middle-of-the-road values: women NEED choice, we NEED access to affordable birth control, and we NEED sensible sex ed in our schools to prevent unintended pregnancy and STD's. Mr. Obama, women thank you.
peltecs (July 22nd, 2008 @ 5:33 pm)
Planned parenthood is a euphemism for abortion clinics. The presidency should not have anything to do with advocating abortion or not. The whole thing is ghoulish. Voting for somebody who will allow you to keep your child or not. Should the president really have the decision of who dies and who lives...save the battlefield?
xxxmonikkkaxxx (July 14th, 2008 @ 2:36 pm)
Lets take a look at the founder of planned parenthood, british eugenics member, Margaret Sanger. "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race
RideOrDieChick13 (July 11th, 2008 @ 10:08 pm)
its easy for you guys to say oh thats killing babies and murder okay you dont know how hard it is to be pregnant and underage when you dont have enough money NO suppeort from parents and your in school you may say oh just give the baby to foster care WTF! even if you did you would have to carry the baby 9 MONTHS! which means you gonna miss months of school.ITS ROUGH so all you suburban people say that abortion is bad what would you do if you werent able to care and support a baby HUH? **cry**
Spaztastica (July 11th, 2008 @ 5:24 am)
Thanking PP for all that they do to "help families" is like thanking a drunk driver that ran over your four-year-old for what he's done to your family. This is rediculous.
thundersbe (July 8th, 2008 @ 6:12 pm)
We can't afford all his tax cuts.
chrispat08 (July 7th, 2008 @ 4:41 pm)
That's an uplifting, innocent comment, but it's completely wrong. Planned Parenthood has an annual budget of around ONE BILLION DOLLARS! About 1/3 of that comes from federal grants and contracts. And the majority of the money they make from "services" comes from doing abortions. How could anyone believe any business would like to make the act they make so much money from rare? Pro-life groups have no hidden agenda, and won't profit from ending abortion, but PP can't survive without it.
jwdiscovery (June 28th, 2008 @ 7:07 pm)
Is the fetus an 'other'? Is it really a 'choice' if most women don't want an abortion but are pressured by economics, boyfriend and family? To me, there might be issues of justice here that need to be discussed. And I'd like to hear that (I hear Obama addresses this in his book. I need to look into that.)
luluspeaks (June 25th, 2008 @ 8:33 pm)
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. C. Gamble

Next