loslambones5ucom (November 18th, 2008 @ 4:36 am)

Thanks for postin

josemanuelsalgado (October 19th, 2008 @ 8:39 pm)

good clip, useful, thanks

kurizzos (September 22nd, 2008 @ 4:55 am)

An observation for anyone viewing vid: The last comment before the credits may be network load balancing. When one of the physical servers are offline, then clustering will handle the loss...

anbu19983 (September 3rd, 2008 @ 9:07 am)

It's really awesome.

robustair (August 31st, 2008 @ 12:17 am)

I am not satisfied with your virtualization video, Its really losting.

eorlas1 (July 31st, 2008 @ 6:44 am)

You can load one server with strong and powerful hardware and then run something like VMWare to make a virtual server that essentially runs a lot of virtual machines that each will draw from a designated amount of resources based on what that virtual machine will be used for. If it's strictly just word processing and browsing the internet, that virtual machine will probably receive 1gb of ram max and maybe a ghz of ram but that's probably pushing it for such a non-demanding workload.

killerdog92 (May 31st, 2008 @ 4:33 pm)

omg, noob, u don't need as many physical servers as before.

foreverseethe (May 30th, 2008 @ 2:00 pm)

totally lost me. IN PLAIN ENGLISH motherfucka!. If Virtualization requires just as much maintenance and increases complexty wtf is the point?!?! I swear, fucking nerds, man.

koonhay (March 21st, 2008 @ 9:06 pm)

what about the harware compatibility issues?

paulcshearer (January 5th, 2008 @ 10:50 pm)

great clip!

eaglefly23 (October 12th, 2007 @ 11:04 am)

great info. clip! gives me reason to hang on to my vmw shares.

LordRhimmer (August 22nd, 2007 @ 9:26 am)

Wow thanks for the info.